Remember: Your methodology is your overall approach or your strategy that you will adopt throughout your research project or dissertation. It forms your ‘toolbox’ and your methods form your ‘tools’ i.e. specifically how you will undertake your research. Normally you choose one methodology and stick to it rather than ‘I’m adopting a part-doctrinal, part-socio-legal, AND comparative methodology’. Otherwise, this becomes too ‘messy’!
This post focuses on the socio-legal methodology. A socio-legal methodology is quite different to the doctrinal methodology that was examined in last week’s blog post. It is different because the socio-legal approach moves away from solely looking at legal instruments to build a more contextual analysis.
There is a lot of academic debate as to ‘what is a socio-legal methodology is’ because there is no single standard definition. In that regard, I would recommend reading different sources to how scholars use this particular methodology.
A good place to start is:
Michael Salter, Julie Mason, Writing Law Dissertations: An Introduction and Guide to the Conduct of Legal Research (Pearson Education 2007), Chapter 5.
Socio-legal scholars argue that law does not operate in vacuum. There are wider considerations which need to be taken into account. Therefore, it is important to go beyond the traditional black-letter approach.
There are some common features within the socio-legal methodology. It generally involves:
- A contextual analysis of the law – how does it operate in society? What are the implications?
- Goes beyond legal texts.
- Supplements legal analysis.
- Is either multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary in nature. If using a socio-legal methodology, you will need to substantiate which aspect you have chosen and why.
- And yes, there is a distinction between multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary
- Broader, more enriched analysis of the law.
- Therefore consideration of wider issues.
- Allows for alternative theoretical and different perspectives on legal issues.
- Incorporates non-legal issues into the context of law, which would be traditionally outside the scope of legal studies.
- Derive new ideas, perspectives or insights.
- Insufficient analysis of the law or legal doctrines.
- Insufficient focus on the law – supplementary material is important, but not at the expense of ignoring the law or legal context.
- Lack of identity – Is it law, is it economics, is it politics, is it sociology?
- Critical analysis is not well-developed – Do you understand the wider theories outside of law? Do you fully understand the underpinning arguments?
- Conceptual theories are not well developed – projects can appear ‘disjointed’ or ‘fragmented’ when being read.
- Weak understanding of the issues that need to be reformed or the challenges in relation to the law, as well as other issues.
Note: A socio-legal approach does NOT mean you ignore the law. It is still important and you will still undertake doctrinal analysis but that forms part of your METHODS. Analysis of the traditional sources/primary sources of law are still highly relevant e.g. statutes, case law etc.
The additional methods that you need to think about is the contextual analysis – is it non-legal? If so, is it from a reputable source? What additional perspective does it add to your research? Is it relevant?
- Cotterrell R, ‘Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically?’ (1998) 25(2) J. of Law & Society 171-192.
- Feenan D, Exploring the ‘Socio’ of Socio-Legal Studies (Palgrave Macmillan 2013).
- Harris D, ‘The Development of Socio-Legal Studies in the United Kingdom’ (1983) 2 Legal Studies 315-333.
- Perry-Kessaris A (ed), Socio-Legal Approaches to International Economic Law (Routledge 2013).
- Salter M, Mason J, Writing Law Dissertations: An Introduction and Guide to the Conduct of Legal Research (Pearson Education 2007).
To find out more and access further materials:
- British Library, ‘Socio-Legal Studies: An Introduction to Collections’ (British Library, 2017) <http://www.bl.uk/reshelp/findhelpsubject/busmanlaw/legalstudies/soclegal/sociolegal.html> accessed 23 January 2017.
- SLSA, ‘About the SLSA’ (SLSA, 2017) <http://www.slsa.ac.uk/index.php/what-is-slsa> accessed 23 January 2017.
 For example, see: Michael Salter, Julie Mason, Writing Law Dissertations: An Introduction and Guide to the Conduct of Legal Research (Pearson Education 2007); Roger Cotterrell, ‘Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically?’ (1998) 25(2) J. of Law & Society 171-192; Don Harris, ‘The Development of Socio-Legal Studies in the United Kingdom’ (1983) 2 Legal Studies 315-333; Dermot Feenan, Exploring the ‘Socio’ of Socio-Legal Studies (Palgrave Macmillan 2013).
 Roger Cotterrell, Law’s Community (OUP 1995) 296.
 For example, see: Michael Salter, Julie Mason, Writing Law Dissertations: An Introduction and Guide to the Conduct of Legal Research (Pearson Education 2007) 133-134.